All manuscripts submitted to Blueprint Journal undergo a double-blind peer review process, in which both the reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other. This process ensures the scientific quality, originality, and relevance of the manuscript.

The review process consists of the following steps:

1. Initial Editorial Screening:
   The editor evaluates the manuscript for its relevance to the journal’s focus and scope, formatting compliance, and plagiarism check.

2. Reviewer Assignment:
   Manuscripts passing the initial check are sent to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.

3. Peer Review:
   Reviewers assess the manuscript based on novelty, methodology, analytical clarity, relevance of references, and overall scientific contribution.

4. Editorial Decision:
   Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editor decides whether the manuscript is:

   • Accepted without revision,

   • Accepted with minor/major revisions, or

   • Rejected.

5. Revision by Authors:
   Authors are required to respond to reviewers’ comments and resubmit the revised manuscript within the specified deadline.

6. Final Decision:
   The editor conducts the final evaluation before publication.

The peer review process typically takes 2–4 weeks, depending on the complexity of the manuscript and the authors’ responsiveness.